PT Boat Forum


Moderated by: Dick, Jeff D

The PT Boat Forum ª PT Boats of WWII ª  PT Boats - General

« Prev Page | Page: 2 of 2

« Back to Topic Index Page 44 | Replies: 13 | Pages: 1 [2]

 Author  Topic: PT 61 SEARLESVILLE RUSSELL ISLANDS MAY 1943
Jeff D

Moderator
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message     View Profile of Jeff D   Send Email To Jeff D Posted on: Apr 14, 2015 - 9:38am
I never doubted your research for a second.

What's the chances of more from this series turning up?



Total Posts: 2200 | Joined: Dec 21, 2006 - 1:30am | IP Logged

Michael Vorrasi

Advanced Member
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message     View Profile of Michael Vorrasi  Posted on: Apr 15, 2015 - 6:44am

"I just noticed something else in this photo that I missed before. Look at the torpedo warhead and tube of "109", it has the same "cartoon drawing/ water color" look I mentioned that is evident in the PT 109 crew photo. This Locks it, Proof!!! These are all from the same roll of film(including the two 109 underway damaged photos), and it was water damaged. SUCCESS!
Take care,
TED"

Ted, actually, we already had proof that the boat along side the 61 was the109. I posted on this a while back. If you refer to the famous bare-chested JFK in the cockpit photo and look at the 77 Elco alongside, compare the "hang" and position of the ropes around the life ring on the 77 Elco with this shot of the 61 and you will see the rope is hanging in the exact same random pattern. Not possible that this could be a coincidence, so we know the unidentified 77 Elco alongside 109 in that shot had to be the 61.
Mike

Total Posts: 72 | Joined: Jul 1, 2013 - 11:46am | IP Logged

  TED WALTHER

TOP BOSS
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message     View Profile of TED WALTHER   Send Email To TED WALTHER Posted on: Apr 16, 2015 - 8:27am
Mike;
Good to hear from you. Understood, but we did a lot of this off the messageboard. However, here I was commenting on the fact that this 61 photo came from the same roll of film that was water damaged, the same roll has this 61 photo, one overhead photo of Ken in the cockpit of 61, the 109 crew photo, and the two 109 underway photos.
The JFK in the cockpit photos are obviously from a second B&W roll of film as they are not damaged. If Ken with his Leica 35mm, used the same type of film that Davy Levy used for his 35mm B&W photos at Tulagi, Levy used Kodak 35mm Panotomic X film and these rolls in 1942-43 had 24 and 36 exposures, I copied 3 of his original photo sheets and it has all the roll markings. Many of Levy's photos are on Gene's website, in Donovan's book and in Levy's own book.
As for the color photos Ken took at Searlesville, in 1942-43 a roll of 35mm Kodacolor film had 18 exposures, so we have some digging to do, to find the rest, because I only have the ones posted here plus two more, that leaves 7 color photos unaccounted for.
Take care,
TED


Total Posts: 3059 | Joined: Oct 16, 2006 - 7:42am | IP Logged

Michael Vorrasi

Advanced Member
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message     View Profile of Michael Vorrasi  Posted on: Apr 16, 2015 - 6:33pm
Hi Ted,
My misunderstanding. I thought you were referring to proof that it was 109 next to the 61, but I now see it was proof of the actual roll of film these were shot on that you were discussing. Very interesting stuff!. I'm a life long shutter bug, so this film detail is right in my wheel house.

Mike

Total Posts: 72 | Joined: Jul 1, 2013 - 11:46am | IP Logged

« Prev Page

Pages: 1 [2]


Lock Topic

 

Forum Legend

New Member

Reply to topic

More than 25 posts | Full Member

Reply to topic with quoted message

More than 50 posts | Advanced Member

Edit Message

More than 150 posts | MASTER

View profile

More than 300 posts | TOP BOSS

Email member