PT Boat Forum


Moderated by: Dick, Jeff D

The PT Boat Forum ª PT Boats of WWII ª  PT Boats - General

« Prev Page | Page: 3 of 3

« Back to Topic Index Page 25 | Replies: 29 | Pages: 1 2 [3]

 Author  Topic: PT 34
alross2

TOP BOSS
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message     View Profile of alross2   Send Email To alross2 Posted on: Mar 29, 2017 - 9:02am
They removed them as soon as the war began.

Al Ross


Total Posts: 993 | Joined: Oct 30, 2006 - 8:19pm | IP Logged

Chuck Bauer

New Member
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message     View Profile of Chuck Bauer  Posted on: Mar 29, 2017 - 1:32pm
VERY interesting. I didn't realize how quickly they were removed. I had the feeling that it may have been many months before all the boats discarded them.
They must have been a nuisance, not sure why they were there to begin with. Seems like they wouldn't be needed to keep wind out like would be the case on a plane. Maybe for bullet/splinter protection?
Anyway, my curiosity is up and I'm going to do more digging now.

Thank you once again for this reply, Mr. Ross.

By the way, this is welcome news. I wasn't very excited about trying to simulate windows and ribs on the 1/350 scale resin turret domes that came in the kit.

Regards,





Chuck

Total Posts: 20 | Joined: Mar 3, 2017 - 3:59pm | IP Logged

Bob Steinbrunn

Advanced Member
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message     View Profile of Bob Steinbrunn   Send Email To Bob Steinbrunn Posted on: Mar 30, 2017 - 8:21am
It's my understanding that the plexiglass domes were removed because their optical clarity was sub-optimal making target tracking difficult. This was due to sun reflections, dust, dirt, water droplets, and salt encrustation.

Cheers!
--Bob

Total Posts: 134 | Joined: Jan 23, 2016 - 9:16am | IP Logged

Bob Steinbrunn

Advanced Member
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message     View Profile of Bob Steinbrunn   Send Email To Bob Steinbrunn Posted on: Mar 30, 2017 - 8:21am
...sort of like...."looking through a glass, darkly". (grin)

Cheers!
--Bob

Total Posts: 134 | Joined: Jan 23, 2016 - 9:16am | IP Logged

alross2

TOP BOSS
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message     View Profile of alross2   Send Email To alross2 Posted on: Mar 30, 2017 - 9:22am
Dad said they fogged up when the guns were fired for any length of time.

Al Ross


Total Posts: 993 | Joined: Oct 30, 2006 - 8:19pm | IP Logged

Will Day

TOP BOSS
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message     View Profile of Will Day   Send Email To Will Day Posted on: Mar 30, 2017 - 11:23am
I guess the original idea was spray protection.....

Will

Total Posts: 1955 | Joined: Oct 8, 2006 - 4:19pm | IP Logged

Chuck Bauer

New Member
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message     View Profile of Chuck Bauer  Posted on: Mar 31, 2017 - 9:52am
Ah yes, spray protection, not wind deflection. The optical clarity issue makes a lot of sense. More use of the guns, less time to keep those windows clean. Truly a life or death situation and thus they deep sixed those domes very quickly.
Thank you all for these enlightening replies.

Chuck

Total Posts: 20 | Joined: Mar 3, 2017 - 3:59pm | IP Logged

Chuck Bauer

New Member
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message     View Profile of Chuck Bauer  Posted on: Apr 29, 2017 - 9:57am
Hi all. Thanks again for your input.

I'm nearly finished with this 1/350 seascape vignette. Helmsman Al Ross is once again manning the starboard bow Lewis gun. I painted in a microscopic strip of black hair under the rear of his helmet but it won't show up in photos.

While waiting for paint and glue to dry, I decided to re-read Joseph Hind's article Squadron of Furies.

I was fascinated to learn that Al Ross had shot a Pete down with a single-barreled Lewis gun. That was quite a feat.
I also noted that Mr. Ross was captured by the Japanese, yet survived the war. That must be quite a story, too.
And finally, the article says that Lt. Kelly was rescued by Lieutenant Bulkeley and his 41 boat. So this got me curious as to how some guys were saved and others were captured.

If anyone has any comments and wants to post them here, I would appreciate it.

But if I don't hear anymore, then I think this thread is finished.

Hope you like the model when I post it on line.

Cheers,
Chuck



Chuck

Total Posts: 20 | Joined: Mar 3, 2017 - 3:59pm | IP Logged

Will Day

TOP BOSS
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message     View Profile of Will Day   Send Email To Will Day Posted on: Apr 29, 2017 - 2:07pm
The RON 3 ACTION REPORTS give a detailed look at the sinking of the 34 boat and of QM1c Ross's actions in bringing down a Japanese floatplane.


Will

Total Posts: 1955 | Joined: Oct 8, 2006 - 4:19pm | IP Logged

Chuck Bauer

New Member
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message     View Profile of Chuck Bauer  Posted on: Apr 29, 2017 - 3:24pm
Thanks for this reply, Mr. Day.
I had forgotten that Dr. Ross had posted these reports and that they would be a logical place to look for more information.

I found the reports that pertain to PT 34, and yes, they do tell the story. Very vividly.

Thanks again gentlemen.


Chuck

Total Posts: 20 | Joined: Mar 3, 2017 - 3:59pm | IP Logged

« Prev Page

Pages: 1 2 [3]


Lock Topic

 

Forum Legend

New Member

Reply to topic

More than 25 posts | Full Member

Reply to topic with quoted message

More than 50 posts | Advanced Member

Edit Message

More than 150 posts | MASTER

View profile

More than 300 posts | TOP BOSS

Email member