PT Boat Forum


Moderated by: Dick, Jeff D

The PT Boat Forum ª PT Boats of WWII ª  PT Boats - General

Next Page » | Page: 1 of 2

« Back to Topic Index Page 76 | Replies: 12 | Pages: [1] 2

 Author  Topic: Elco Rudders
Roy Forbes

TOP BOSS
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message     View Profile of Roy Forbes  Posted on: Jul 1, 2013 - 6:13pm
OK, this might be an obvious issue here but one that has been bothering me for some time. As I sit here staring at my speed built 157, I'm wondering if anybody knows why Elco never increased the size of those tiny little rudders. I'm always reading and hearing stories about how the Higgins boats more more maneuverable and I must be missing something here. However, I must say that the aerial shot above that high speed 180 turn that Elco boat made in Newark Bay near the end of the Elco film is quite impressive.
Any thoughts?


Total Posts: 371 | Joined: Sep 5, 2012 - 4:57pm | IP Logged

Stuart Hurley

MASTER
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message     View Profile of Stuart Hurley  Posted on: Jul 2, 2013 - 1:14am
Roy,
I am not an expert on these things but increasing rudder size does not automatically increase it's efficiency as other problems can be introduced such as drag, chattering/cavitation, and stress on the steering system. The shape and ratio of blade infront/ behind of the pivot is also important in high speed rudders.
I guess the engineers at Elco felt that they had made them as efficient as they could.


Best Regards,
Stu.





Total Posts: 255 | Joined: Mar 19, 2013 - 3:32am | IP Logged

  Frank Andruss

TOP BOSS
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message     View Profile of Frank Andruss   Send Email To Frank Andruss Posted on: Jul 2, 2013 - 1:29am
Roy, don't forget that HIGGINS used only 2 Large Rudders, where ELCO used three small ones. They would have had to redesign the whole system. Elco boats used special pitched high speed props that would have also had to have been changed. I am sure engineers at Elco were always looking for ways to improve performance on the boats, trying to increase speed and engine performances. They were always looking for ways to keep the wake of the boats to a minimum, but with the high torque of the engines, they never found a way to do this. Somewhere, in my artifacts, I have a performance chart on the props. If I find it I will post it here. .............


Total Posts: 3964 | Joined: Feb 9, 2007 - 11:41am | IP Logged

TED WALTHER

TOP BOSS
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message     View Profile of TED WALTHER   Send Email To TED WALTHER Posted on: Jul 2, 2013 - 6:25am
Roy;
Stuart and Frank are correct, the Elco rudders were place behind each propelller, therefore drag would play a factor in the size, also cavitation, and stress on the steering system would be created, if the prop remained the same but the rudder size was increased. Making the whole system less efficent (increase in fuel ,etc).
Take care,
TED.


Total Posts: 3058 | Joined: Oct 16, 2006 - 7:42am | IP Logged

PeterTareBuilder2

MASTER
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message     View Profile of PeterTareBuilder2  Posted on: Jul 2, 2013 - 6:46am
Quote:

Roy;
Stuart and Frank are correct, the Elco rudders were place behind each propelller, therefore drag would play a factor in the size, also cavitation, and stress on the steering system would be created, if the prop remained the same but the rudder size was increased. Making the whole system less efficent (increase in fuel ,etc).
Take care,
TED.





Hi there.

Interestingly enough, you run into the exact same problem when building a scale radio-controlled model. The motors, prop shafts, props and rudders are designed as a balanced system. Chanhe the props or rudders size and you can introduce all sorts of problems. Even the amount a rudder is turned is limited b ecause after a certain number of degrees it stops acting as a turning device and works more as a brake which in turn puts a lot of load on the still reving motors which in turn causes them to overheat quickly.

As for the Higgins out turning the 80' Elcos, I think that is more a hull design issue than a rudder issue. If the Higgins only had two rudders but three running props that means that one of the rudders was not in line with a prop. Usually for maxinum rudder efficiency you want it aft of a prop so that the prop stream meets the rudder.

I recently put a very powerful motos into my 1/32 scale Lindberg PT boat that only has the original two kit rudders. Each rudder is aft of tthe wind motor. I have two really cheap hobby motors on the wing shafts. Interestingly enough, with just the high speed powerful center prop running thte turning radius of the model is a lot worse than it is if I run on just the two cheap hobby motors on the wing shafts.

Cheers from Peter

"Give me a fast boat for we want to get out of harm's way too."

Total Posts: 204 | Joined: Dec 8, 2012 - 6:03pm | IP Logged

Roy Forbes

TOP BOSS
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message     View Profile of Roy Forbes  Posted on: Jul 2, 2013 - 12:30pm
Thanks so much guys. Very interesting points. I can put that finally to rest, however, now you have opened another issue I can ponder. I have 3 nice large counter balanced rudders on the 623. A real pain to make but if I cut them down, will she run me efficiently?
And if not, mmmm, a bigger pain. Maybe I should leave things alone when all seems to be good.


Total Posts: 371 | Joined: Sep 5, 2012 - 4:57pm | IP Logged

Bob Butler

MASTER
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message     View Profile of Bob Butler  Posted on: Jul 2, 2013 - 1:50pm
The other guys have put their 2 cents worth in so I will do the same. A big thing for the Elcos were operating in the shallow waters. Maybe the shorter the rudder the better. Only a guess. By the way the kit rudders shape is a little off.


Total Posts: 192 | Joined: Mar 23, 2013 - 11:58am | IP Logged

  TED WALTHER

TOP BOSS
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message     View Profile of TED WALTHER   Send Email To TED WALTHER Posted on: Jul 2, 2013 - 5:26pm
Bob;
I agree. But WOW, spoken like a TRUE steerable Elco Box fan!!!
Go Jerry Take your best shot!
Take care,
TED


Total Posts: 3058 | Joined: Oct 16, 2006 - 7:42am | IP Logged

  Jerry Gilmartin

TOP BOSS
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message     View Profile of Jerry Gilmartin   Send Email To Jerry Gilmartin Posted on: Jul 2, 2013 - 8:41pm
Ted,
Fastest frontline PT boat was Higgins PT238 July 4th Race between 4 Squadrons based in Mindoro. ( I know Ron 16 and Ron20 were two of them) Close 2nd place
( by a mere 4 boat lengths) was a 77 foot Elco. They raced over a measured 10 mile straight line course and completed it in 8 minutes. That equals 75mph. Race rules specified full wartime weapons and fuel load and full crew on board. The Elco lost at least one of her engines during the race when they jumped a wave and the overspeed trip killed the ignition. Elco box my ass! Higgins Rule!

Peter, when you say "If the Higgins only had two rudders but three running props that means that one of the rudders was not in line with a prop."
I think you meant to say "that means each prop is not in line with a rudder". Because both of the Higgins Rudders are located directly in-line with each of the two outboard props. The center prop has no rudder associated with it. There is no rudder hanging out there all by itself. Just a clarification.

Have a Happy 4th of July everyone!
Jerry
PT658 HIGGINS




Jerry Gilmartin

Total Posts: 1469 | Joined: Oct 8, 2006 - 11:16pm | IP Logged

PeterTareBuilder2

MASTER
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message     View Profile of PeterTareBuilder2  Posted on: Jul 2, 2013 - 10:10pm
Quote:

Ted,
Fastest frontline PT boat was Higgins PT238 July 4th Race between 4 Squadrons based in Mindoro. ( I know Ron 16 and Ron20 were two of them) Close 2nd place
( by a mere 4 boat lengths) was a 77 foot Elco. They raced over a measured 10 mile straight line course and completed it in 8 minutes. That equals 75mph. Race rules specified full wartime weapons and fuel load and full crew on board. The Elco lost at least one of her engines during the race when they jumped a wave and the overspeed trip killed the ignition. Elco box my ass! Higgins Rule!

Peter, when you say "If the Higgins only had two rudders but three running props that means that one of the rudders was not in line with a prop."
I think you meant to say "that means each prop is not in line with a rudder". Because both of the Higgins Rudders are located directly in-line with each of the two outboard props. The center prop has no rudder associated with it. There is no rudder hanging out there all by itself. Just a clarification.

Have a Happy 4th of July everyone!
Jerry
PT658 HIGGINS




Jerry Gilmartin



Hi Jerry.

No, I meant what I wrote. One prop, the center one is not in line with a prop; just as yoy confirmed with different wording. ;<) I meant that the two outboard props on the Higgins boats were in line with the two outboard props but the center prop had no rudder aft of it. Apparently rudders work far better if they are in line with a prop. I guess thats because the prop condenses the water that flows to tthe rudder and being in line the rudder is exposed to tthe full force of that condensed water.

I think it would be really interesting to see what a center rudder (third rudder) in line with the center prop would do to increase the turning radius of a Higgins boat.

Cheers from Peter

"Give me a fast boat for we want to get out of harm's way too."

Total Posts: 204 | Joined: Dec 8, 2012 - 6:03pm | IP Logged

Next Page »

Pages: [1] 2


Lock Topic

 

Forum Legend

New Member

Reply to topic

More than 25 posts | Full Member

Reply to topic with quoted message

More than 50 posts | Advanced Member

Edit Message

More than 150 posts | MASTER

View profile

More than 300 posts | TOP BOSS

Email member