Author |
Topic: Loading Ammo Belts for .50-cal |
|
Allan
MASTER
|
Posted on: Jul 24, 2009 - 7:42pm
|
Can anyone tell me the sequence for the loading of the different rounds into the .50-cal. machinegun ammo belts? I can remember my father running through the sequence as if he was doing it in his sleep but I do not remember the sequence. I'm somewhat certain that the fourth round was tracer, so: armor piercing, incendiary, ball, tracer seems to me to be his sequence. Did it really matter, as long as each type of round duplicated itself every fourth cartrdge? -- Allan
|
Total Posts: 161 | Joined:
Sep 18, 2007 - 7:07pm | IP
Logged
|
|
BobPic
New Member
|
Posted on: Jul 25, 2009 - 7:09am
|
On our boat, PT 167, it was optional and depended on the situation. Usually there was a default sequence approved by the skipper, but we changed patterns at times. One rule was that you couldn't insert tracers more often than every four bullets because it would overheat the barrel. We often did it anyway since we loaded our own belts. Sometimes not all types were available and we adjusted the pattern. No one felt there was an inviolate rule. It was sort of shooters choice.
|
Total Posts: | Joined:
Unregistered | IP
Logged
|
|
Frank J Andruss Sr
TOP BOSS
|
Posted on: Jul 25, 2009 - 7:10am
|
Hello Allen
I think the sequence for loading the 50 caliber rounds were:
1. Ball
2. Armor Piercing
3. Tracer
4. Incendiary
Also, the 50 caliber gun was the M2 Aircraft type that had the shorter barrel and perforated jacket. This was a lighter gun and actually had a higher rate of fire. I think that was the sequence, but maybe I am wrong...........
|
Total Posts: 3497 | Joined:
Oct 9, 2006 - 6:09am | IP
Logged
|
|
CJ Willis
TOP BOSS
|
Posted on: Jul 25, 2009 - 9:21am
|
We tried to get all our 50 cal. ammo already belted from the base armory. We had clips and a squeezer to belt it aboard but that was a slow process with the equipment we had. It took a while to belt up 250 rounds. Every fourth round was a tracer.
C. J. Willis |
Total Posts: 464 | Joined:
Nov 5, 2006 - 5:02pm | IP
Logged
|
|
Jeff D
Moderator
|
Posted on: Jul 25, 2009 - 11:51am
|
Here's the "official" specs early in the war. Curiously, different type boats have different specs.
Judging by what BobPic said, some recommended loads would overheat the barrels so I'd bet later doctrine manuals had different specs. I'd also bet that most crews figured out what was best and didn't always follow doctrine, again like BobPic said.
Motor Torpedo Boats, Tactical Orders and Doctrine, July 1942
http://www.hnsa.org/doc/pt/doctrine/part1.htm
MILITARY CHARACTERISTICS
1107
(1) PT 20 type-PTs 20-68 (Elco Boatworks). Length 77 feet; beam 20 feet; maximum draft 5 feet; displacement 95,000 pounds.
.50-caliber:
Allowance-10,000 rounds per gun.
Carried on board-1,000 rounds per gun belted (ratio one Tr. to two A. P.) in four 250-round magazines per gun.
(2) PT 71 type-PTs 71-94 (Higgins Industries). Length 78 feet; beam ____ feet; maximum draft _____; displacement _____ pounds.
.50-caliber:
Allowance-10,000 rounds per gun.
Carried on board-1,000 rounds per gun belted (ratio one Tr. to two A. P.) in four 250-round magazines per gun.
(3) PT 95 type-PTs 95-102 (Huckins Yacht Corp.) length 80 feet; beam ____ feet; maximum draft ____ feet; displacement ____ pounds.
.50-caliber:
Allowance-10,000 rounds per gun.
Carried on board-1,000 rounds per gun belted (ratio one Tr. to one A. P.) in four 250-round magazines per gun.
(4) PT 103 type-PTs 103-196 (Elco Boat Works). Length 80 feet 3 inches; beam 20 feet 10 3/4 inches; max. draft 5 feet 3/4 inch; displacement 100,000 pounds.
.50-caliber:
Allowance-10,000 rounds per gun.
Carried on board-1,000 rounds per gun belted (ratio one Tr. to one A. P.) in four 250-round magazines per gun.
|
Total Posts: 2200 | Joined:
Dec 21, 2006 - 1:30am | IP
Logged
|
|
CJ Willis
TOP BOSS
|
Posted on: Jul 25, 2009 - 1:57pm
|
On my gun I never thought the tracers made any difference in the barrels overheating. You had to fire in bursts of about 5 seconds and then let off. If you fired continuous the barrels would get red hot. I have seen them actually sag in the middle between the supports. We had one bow gunner who we could never train to fire in bursts. He would just lay down on the triggers until he shot the whole 250 round belts. He ruined the barrels every time he fired. I will admit it is hard to lay off when the tracers are coming back your way.
C. J. Willis |
Total Posts: 464 | Joined:
Nov 5, 2006 - 5:02pm | IP
Logged
|
|
Allan
MASTER
|
Posted on: Jul 25, 2009 - 9:35pm
|
Thanks Guys- very interesting and very helpful. Apparently the Division 17 boats did not have access to ammo belts pre-loaded and had to accept the reloading of the belts as part of the daily work of getting the boats ready for the coming night's patorl. As if they didn't have enough to do. Just fueling the boats through a chamois into a three-gallon pail and then dumping that into the tank took most of the day for a couple of fellows. In that neck-of-the-woods in early 1943 they really didn't have much of anything. -- Allan
|
Total Posts: 161 | Joined:
Sep 18, 2007 - 7:07pm | IP
Logged
|
|
Jeff D
Moderator
|
Posted on: Jul 26, 2009 - 2:08pm
|
Dayum CJ, that's hot. Sounds like they weren't too far from having a bullet go through their sides. The aircraft versions of the M2 used on PT boats were really meant to be moving through the air a lot faster I guess.
Allen, that sounds like a bummer job, spending all day with open containers of high octane gas and sucking down the fumes. I bet they kept the smokers far away.
|
Total Posts: 2200 | Joined:
Dec 21, 2006 - 1:30am | IP
Logged
|
|
Allan
MASTER
|
Posted on: Jul 27, 2009 - 7:37pm
|
Jeff D.:
Fueling was such a problem that Lt. Comdr. Frank Munroe, captain of the tender Hilo, complained to his command about the rediculously dangerous and labor-intensive procedures that put everyone at risk. Two PTs and a couple of Australian vessels were lost at Advance Base Tufi due to poor fueling procedures that resulted in a major fire. Also lost in that fire was most of the gasoline storage, depth charges, etc. The fire burned for two days because there was no means of extinguishing it. Just more of what Div 17 boats had to contend with- and at that point things were actually improving !! But spending your day after a night of patrolling and strafing shorelines in search of return fire reloading ammo belts and refueling the boats while suffering from the pounding headaches of malaria and dysentary while eating only a poor vitamin deficient diet of Spam and hard buiscuts or tinned Australian meat of some unidentified kind in the 90 plus degrees and wanting more than anything else just a little sleep. They had it a bit rough. Getting shot at was the least of their worries, it seems.
Allan
|
Total Posts: 161 | Joined:
Sep 18, 2007 - 7:07pm | IP
Logged
|
|
BobPic
New Member
|
Posted on: Jul 28, 2009 - 5:28am
|
Allan: You hit the fueling fiasco directly on the head. We feared fire more than Japs. Crew who were not necessary at the feuling dock generally tried to find an excuse to be absent. Other work demanded that some stay through the long refeuling. Your description of the chow situation was also as though you were there. But most of us kids didn't know better, we just thought it was a war and that was the way war was. I am proud that I was part of it, but do not plan to go back.
|
Total Posts: | Joined:
Unregistered | IP
Logged
|
|
|