PT Boat Forum


Moderated by: Dick, Jeff D

The PT Boat Forum ª PT Boats of WWII ª  PT Boats - General

« Prev Page | Page: 3 of 3

« Back to Topic Index Page 178 | Replies: 23 | Pages: 1 2 [3]

 Author  Topic: PT 109 Model
Frank J Andruss Sr

TOP BOSS
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message     View Profile of Frank J Andruss Sr   Send Email To Frank J Andruss Sr Posted on: May 12, 2009 - 5:48pm
Drew:

No offense taken. I realize how hard some of you modelers work to have the most acurate and detailed models. Heck, I want the same thing for my Exhibit. I guess I just was thinking outloud and was concerned about the man who took the time to build it. Thanks for writing.....


Total Posts: 3497 | Joined: Oct 9, 2006 - 6:09am | IP Logged

TGConnelly

New Member
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message   Posted on: May 13, 2009 - 6:27am
Drew ...

In a way, Frank has a point ...

Has anyone here ever seen me openly criticize a model?

Drew, you might very well know alot about the 109 and that's good sir. But, maybe Mr. Fraske doesn't ... Or, maybe he was just building the model for the pure enjoyment of the hobby ... or, maybe he was at the cusp of his ability.




Total Posts: | Joined: Unregistered | IP Logged

Drew Cook

TOP BOSS
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message     View Profile of Drew Cook  Posted on: May 13, 2009 - 8:46am
I don't really know how to respond to that one, Garth, except to say that this mildly scolding tone directed towards me for my critique of Mr. Fraske's model is rather ridiculous...

When Al Ross corrected my long-held belief about the "PT 109" movie boats being 63' or 65' foot Air-Sea Rescue boats, and informed me that they were actually 85-footers, I immediately took this information at face value and accepted it. No one was concerned with my feelings about being corrected (nor should they have been), and I took no umbrage at the correction. Granted, Dr. Ross is a true, published expert on PTs and I'm only an amateur historian/enthusiast.

My post on the model was a specific and detailed response to your question about what, in essence, were questions of detail and accuracy I had with it. A concern with Mr. Fraske's feelings or his talents as a modeler didn't figure into it, nor did I think it was necessary. I still don't. We're not in grade school.

I've both complimented Mr. Fraske's work and critiqued it sufficiently. I won't apologize any further for speaking what I think is the truth, or feel badly about doing so.

It's still a nice-looking model.


Total Posts: 1306 | Joined: Oct 19, 2006 - 10:44am | IP Logged

TGConnelly

New Member
  

    
Post a Reply To This Topic    Reply With Quotes     Edit Message   Posted on: May 13, 2009 - 3:00pm
Again, I was misunderstood. Par for the course of my life lately.


Total Posts: | Joined: Unregistered | IP Logged

« Prev Page

Pages: 1 2 [3]


Lock Topic

 

Forum Legend

New Member

Reply to topic

More than 25 posts | Full Member

Reply to topic with quoted message

More than 50 posts | Advanced Member

Edit Message

More than 150 posts | MASTER

View profile

More than 300 posts | TOP BOSS

Email member